The proper policy document is located
on the CAcert website .
This document is for the purposes of policy group preparing work-in-progress and DRAFT future revisions.
It is primarily relevant for the [policy] group.
Any approved DRAFT change herein may be considered,
as an Arbitrator will likely enforce their effect,
but they are unlikely to effect most disputes.

Colour code:

A history of modifications is maintained at the end.

Name: DRP COD7
Status: POLICY m20070919.3
            DRAFT p20110108 p20121213 p20130116
Editor: Teus Hagen
Licence: CC-by-sa+DRP
DRP Status - DRAFT

Dispute Resolution Policy

0. Introduction

This is the Dispute Resolution Policy for CAcert for the CAcert Community, consisting of CAcert Inc and Members who agree to the CAcert Community Agreement (CCA). Disputes arising out of operations by CAcert Inc and interactions between Members may be addressed through this policy. This document also presents the rules for resolution of disputes.

0.1 Nature of Disputes

Disputes include:

1. Filing

1.1 Filing Party

Anyone may file a dispute. In filing, they become Claimants.

1.2 Channel for Filing

Disputes are filed by being sent to the normal support channel of CAcert, and a fee may be payable.

Such fees as are imposed on filing will be specified on the dispute resolution page of the website.

1.3 Case Manager

The Case Manager (CM) takes control of the filing.

  1. CM makes an initial determination as to whether this filing is a dispute for resolution, or it is a request for routine support.
  2. CM logs the case and establishes such documentation and communications support as is customary.
  3. If any party acts immediately on the filing (such as an urgent security action), the CM names these parties to the case.
  4. CM selects the Arbitrator.

The personnel within the CAcert support team are Case Managers, by default, or as directed by the Dispute Resolution Officer (DRO).

1.4 Contents

The filing must specify:

If the filing is inadequate for lack of information or for format, the Case Manager may refile with the additional information, attaching the original messages.

1.5 The Arbitrator

The Case Manager selects the Arbitrator according to the mechanism managed by the DRO and approved from time to time. This mechanism is to maintain a list of Arbitrators available for dispute resolution. Each selected Arbitrator has the right to decline the dispute, and should decline a dispute with which there exists a conflict of interest. The reason for declining should be stated. If no Arbitrator accepts the dispute, the case is closed with status "declined."

Arbitrators are experienced Assurers of CAcert. They should be independent and impartial, including of CAcert Inc. itself where it becomes a party.

2. The Arbitration

2.1 Authority

The Board of CAcert Inc. and the Members of the Community vest in Arbitrators full authority to hear disputes and deliver rulings which are binding on CAcert Inc. and the Members.

2.2 Preliminaries

The Arbitrator conducts some preliminaries:

2.3 Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction - the right or power to hear and rule on disputes - is initially established by clauses in the CAcert Community Agreement. The agreement must establish:

An external court may have ("assert") jurisdiction to decide on issues such as trademark, privacy, contract and fraud, and may do so with legal remedies. These are areas where jurisdiction may need to be considered carefully:

The Arbitrator must consider jurisdiction and rule on a case by case basis whether jurisdiction is asserted, either wholly or partially, or declines to hear the case. In the event of asserting jurisdiction, and a NRP later decides to pursue rights in another forum, the Arbitrator should seek the agreement of the NRP to file the ruling as part of the new case.

2.4 Basis in Law

Each country generally has an Arbitration Act that elevates Arbitration as a strong dispute resolution forum. The Act generally defers to Arbitration if the parties have so agreed. That is, as Members users of CAcert, you agree to resolve all disputes before CAcert's forum. This is sometimes called private law or alternative dispute resolution.

As a matter of public policy, courts will generally refer any case back to Arbitration. Members should understand that they will have strictly limited rights to ask the courts to seek to have a case heard or to override a Ruling.

2.5 External Courts

When an external court claims and asserts its jurisdiction, and issues a court order, subpoena or other service to CAcert, the CM files the order as a dispute, with the external court as Claimant. The CM and other support staff are granted no authority to act on the basis of any court order, and ordinarily must await the order of the Arbitrator (which might simply be a repeat of the external court order).

The Arbitrator establishes the bona fides of the court, and rules. The Arbitrator may rule to reject the order, for jurisdiction or other reasons. By way of example, if all Parties are Members, then jurisdiction more normally falls within the forum. If the Arbitrator rules to reject, he should do so only after consulting with CAcert Inc. counsel. The Arbitrator's jurisidiction is ordinarily that of dealing with the order, and not that which the external court has claimed to.

2.6 Process

The Arbitrator follows the procedure:

  1. Establish the facts. The Arbitrator collects the evidence from the parties. The Arbitrator may order CAcert Inc. or Members under jurisdiction to provide support or information. The Arbitrator may use email, phone or face-to-face meetings as proceedings.
  2. Apply the Rules of Dispute Resolution, the policies of CAcert and the governing law. The Arbitrator may request that the parties submit their views. The Arbitrator also works to the mission of CAcert, the benefit of all Members , and the community as a whole. The Arbitrator may seek any assistance.
  3. Makes a considered Ruling.

3. The Ruling

3.1 The Contents

The Arbitrator records:

  1. The Identification of the Parties,
  2. The Facts,
  3. The logic of the rules and law,
  4. The directions and actions to be taken by each party (the ruling).
  5. The date and place that the ruling is rendered.

3.2 Process

Once the Ruling is delivered, the case is closed. The Case Manager is responsible for recording the Ruling, publishing it, and advising Members.

Proceedings are ordinarily private. The Ruling is ordinarily published, within the bounds of the Privacy Policy. The Ruling is written in English.

Only under exceptional circumstances can the Arbitrator declare the Ruling private under seal. Such a declaration must be reviewed in its entirety by the Board, and the Board must confirm or deny that declaration. If it confirms, the existence of any Rulings under seal must be published to the Members in a timely manner (within days).

3.3 Binding and Final

The Ruling is ordinarily final and binding binding and final on CAcert Inc. and all Members . Ordinarily, all Members agree to be bound by this dispute resolution policy. Members must declare in the Preliminaries any default in agreement or binding.

If a person who is not a Member is a party to the dispute, then the Ruling is not binding and final on that person, but the Ruling must be presented in filing any dispute in another forum such as the person's local courts.

3.4 Review for Appeal (DRAFT p20110108)      Re-opening the Case or Appeal

In the event case of clear injustices, egregious behaviour or unconscionable Rulings, a review may be requested by filing a dispute (DRAFT p20110108). parties may seek to re-open the case by filing a dispute. The new Arbitrator reviews the new dispute, re-examines and reviews the entire case, then rules on whether the case may be re-opened or not.

If the Review Arbitrator rules the case be re-opened, then the Review Arbitrator refers the case to an Appeal Panel of 3. The Appeal Panel is led by a Senior Arbitrator, and is formed according to procedures established by the DRO from time to time. The Appeal Panel hears the case and delivers a final and binding Ruling. (DRAFT p20110108) If the new Arbitrator rules the case be re-opened, then it is referred to the Board of CAcert Inc. The Board hears the case and delivers a final and binding Ruling.

3.5 Liability

All liability of the Arbitrator for any act in connection with deciding a dispute is excluded by all parties, provided such act does not constitute an intentional breach of duty. All liability of the Arbitrators, CAcert Inc., its officers and its employees (including Case Manager) for any other act or omission in connection with arbitration proceedings is excluded, provided such acts do not constitute an intentional or grossly negligent breach of duty.

The above provisions may only be overridden by appeal process (by means of a new dispute causing referral to the Board).

3.6 Remedies

The Arbitrator generally instructs using internal remedies, that is ones that are within the general domain of CAcert the Community, but there are some external remedies at his disposal. He may rule and instruct any of the parties on these issues.

The Arbitrator is not limited within the general domain of CAcert, and may instruct novel remedies as seen fit. Remedies remain subject to appeal. Novel remedies outside the domain may be routinely confirmed by the Board by way of appeal process, in order to establish precedent.

4. Appendix

4.1 The Advantages of this Forum

The advantage of this process for Members is:

4.2 The Disadvantages of this Forum

Some disadvantages exist.

4.3 Process and Flow

To the extent reasonable, the Arbitrator conducts the arbitration as with any legal proceedings. This means that the process and style should follow legal tradition.

However, the Arbitrator is unlikely to be trained in law. Hence, common sense must be applied, and the Arbitrator has wide latitude to rule on any particular motion, pleading, submission. The Arbitrator's ruling is final within the arbitration.

Note also that many elements of legal proceedings are deliberately left out of the rules.

History of modifications:

Valid XHTML 1.1